Introduction

Good day, everyone. Let us delve into 1 Samuel chapter 27. Before examining the contents of this chapter, we must first understand the author's perspective on David. From the initial depiction of David to the current chapter 27, it is evident that the author holds a rather positive view of David. Simultaneously, it is clear that the entire 1 Samuel narrates God's search for a faithful priest. The early chapters focus on Samuel, followed by David, with Saul interspersed between them. Up to this chapter, the narrative underscores that God is perpetually seeking a faithful individual.

It's crucial not to misunderstand that a faithful person must also be astute, as faithfulness is unattainable without shrewdness. It's rumored that 1 Samuel was not written by Samuel, as he had already passed away by the time the later chapters were composed, making it impossible for him to document the events that transpired afterward. Regardless of the true identity of the author of 1 Samuel, what matters is that in narrating this story, whether concerning Samuel, Saul, or David, the author adopts God's perspective to illustrate the theme: God is seeking a faithful priest. Irrespective of one's status, what matters is one's faithfulness to God.

This chapter portrays David's interpersonal astuteness. Astuteness in a person is not alarming; what is alarming is foolishness. Foolishness is truly dreadful. Some individuals are so foolish that they perceive kindness as malicious intent, while mistaking deception for benevolence. Dealing with such individuals is truly disheartening. Hence, I harbor the belief that I am most afraid of serving foolish individuals. Even if foolish individuals possess faithfulness, it remains questionable, as they lack situational awareness. As pastors, when ministering, I encourage you not to fear astute individuals, but rather to fear foolish ones. Foolish individuals cannot distinguish between good and bad, while astute individuals discern whether you are acting benevolently or with malicious intent. Of course, we pastors do not wish to harm anyone; we fear those who act foolishly. The more you try to help them and treat them with kindness, the more they suspect you of harboring malicious intent.

I have previously mentioned during Bible studies and sermons that foolish individuals worldwide share a common trait: they are bullies at home, weaklings abroad. The sayings may vary across regions; foreigners undoubtedly have their own expressions. In northern China, such individuals are referred to as 炕头王, meaning they are insignificant outside but formidable at home. When interacting with outsiders, they willingly endure losses, yet at home, they display their prowess towards their loving family. In southern China, such individuals are called 窝里横. I have since discovered a pattern: those who are formidable outside are often not formidable at home. Conversely, those who perceive themselves as formidable and remarkable at home are often the most foolish.

There was once such an individual who would quarrel with his mother when he was in good health. Despite his mother's deep love for him, he insisted on being a 窝里横 towards her. When his health deteriorated, he refused to answer anyone's calls and arbitrarily blacklisted people, indulging in pointless, nonsensical actions, which ultimately led to tragedy. Each time I minister to foolish individuals, I feel trepidation, as if walking on thin ice. Therefore, I particularly appreciate astute individuals, as I often feel inadequate and can learn much from their interpersonal skills.

Let us now return to David. It is uncertain whether the author intentionally created a pitfall for readers here. In the opening verse, David declares that he will inevitably die at the hand of Saul. This statement sounds uncharacteristic of a person of faith, but we cannot know David's true thoughts.

Determine the Theme First, Regardless of What You Do

First and foremost, it must be mentioned that regardless of what we do, read, or learn, we must first identify the theme. Do not hastily criticize or label David as lacking faith based on a single statement before fully comprehending the narrative.

David said to himself, “One of these days I will be destroyed by the hand of Saul. The best thing I can do is to escape to the land of the Philistines. Then Saul will give up searching for me anywhere in Israel, and I will slip out of his hand. (1 Samuel 27:1)

This statement may seem as if David is contemplating treason, as he intends to flee to the Philistines. However, we have not experienced a similar situation. If faced with the same circumstances, we might not fare as well as David. I urge you to grasp the theme, as those who fail to do so will be distracted by trivial matters and become disoriented. Those who cannot grasp the theme are often muddle-headed and superficial in their understanding. In truth, David's life after fleeing to Philistia was not easy. However, the author emphasizes David's interpersonal astuteness. If we misinterpret the narrative, we will lose sight of the theme.

So David and the six hundred men with him left and went over to Achish son of Maok, the king of Gath. David and his two wives, Ahinoam of Jezreel and Abigail of Carmel, the widow of Nabal, lived in Gath with Achish. David and his men settled in Gath with Achish, each man with his family. (1 Samuel 27:2-3)

When reading and learning, one must learn to grasp the theme, and avoid straying from it. In this chapter, if we fixate on the opening statement, we will be unable to proceed and disregard the theme of astuteness. In reality, David undoubtedly contemplated his decision before fleeing to Philistia. The author of 1 Samuel likely wrote this chapter during David's reign or Solomon's reign when the truth had come to light and the events had passed. Therefore, grasping the theme is like discerning a person's inner self. We must now definitively understand that David's flight to the Philistines was, in fact, a meticulously planned scheme.

Plan Everything You Do

Over the past three to five years, I have consistently trained individuals to plan their actions meticulously. Planning entails assessing the returns, investments, risks, and the capacity to manage those risks in the future. Failure to manage risks is problematic. David's interpersonal astuteness lies in his profound understanding of people's thoughts and intentions. As we continue reading, we will discover that subsequent events unfolded precisely as David had planned. Now, let us simultaneously discuss David and the importance of planning in all endeavors.

Let me first analyze how David contemplated this matter. He fled to Achish, the king of Gath, despite having slain Goliath, a Gathite, years prior. Why would he consider fleeing to Achish? Have you ever heard the saying, The most dangerous place is the safest place? However, this is not the key. The key is that King Saul and Achish were enemies, and Saul's pursuit of David was known worldwide. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Furthermore, David was once a formidable minister under Saul, capable of seizing enemy generals' heads with ease. He was a valiant and influential figure.

David did not leave a single person alive, male or female, who could have told Gath what they had been doing. He thought, “They might tell about us and say, ‘This is what David has been doing all the time he has lived in Philistine territory.’” Achish trusted David and said to himself, “He has become so obnoxious to his people, the Israelites, that he will be my servant for life.” (1 Samuel 27:11-12)

David surmised that Achish would highly value military generals. In this modern era, warfare involves missiles, allowing for strikes against distant targets with ease. In David's time, however, warfare was conducted with cold weapons, emphasizing martial prowess. Just as Cao Cao cherished Guan Yu because heroes admire each other, Achish likely felt similarly towards David. He recognized David's exceptional abilities, acknowledging that someone who could slay Goliath must possess formidable martial skills.

Achish also calculated that acquiring David as his servant would provide him with valuable talent, a notion supported by David's impressive track record. Of course, David also knew how to calculate. Saul was pursuing David, and Achish was Saul's enemy. Achish was, therefore, David's enemy's enemy. Trust, however, was a separate matter.

By going to Achish, David could avoid further harassment from Saul and seize the opportunity to recuperate. David had spared Saul twice before, but there was no guarantee that Saul would not pursue him again, forcing him to flee with his men. After those two incidents, resentment undoubtedly festered among David's men, who complained that David had failed to eliminate Saul when he had the chance, forcing them into a state of constant homelessness. If Saul were to pursue them again, David could spare Saul once more, but it would be difficult to justify to his men.

As a good leader, one must manage subordinates effectively to accomplish tasks, which requires calculation. David calculated that joining forces with the enemy of his enemy would be advantageous. Although David had slain Goliath in the past, it was not a significant issue, as the events had already transpired. Achish would undoubtedly be eager to acquire David as a capable lieutenant who could assist him in conquering territory. If David were incompetent and excelled only at eating, Achish would not have taken him in.

Remember that when undertaking any endeavor, you must carefully consider the returns and risks to have a clear understanding. To gain Achish's trust, the most effective approach was for David to kill the people of Judah and attack Saul, thus making the Israelites despise him, seemingly turning David into a traitor. His plan was to go to the southern region of Judah, which was actually not Judah itself. He planned to attack that area and then bring back the spoils, including oxen, sheep, camels, clothing, and various treasures. By attacking the area bordering Judah, it would be unclear whether it was still Judah, demonstrating David's prowess and astuteness.

He attacked the land, leaving no one alive, male or female; he took sheep, cattle, donkeys, camels and clothes, and then returned to Achish. (1 Samuel 27:9)

Regardless of your actions, ensure that you have calculated them thoroughly. What is most alarming is acting impulsively without due consideration. Later, when David governed the nation of Israel, his subordinates, recognizing his astuteness, dared not deceive him. To become such an individual is remarkable. After David had clearly calculated the situation, he divided the spoils, akin to resources like oil, equally with Achish. Naturally, Achish was pleased and found the arrangement favorable.

I began leading everyone in studying the Bible many years ago. Recently, I listened to a Bible study I conducted eight or nine years ago, during which I discussed astuteness and the need to be wise. It seems I was aware of this concept even then, although I had forgotten it. In truth, it is something that has always resonated within me.

It is foolish to tread a path of folly; do not be foolish, and certainly not muddle-headed. There are grave risks to being foolish. Let me be clear, the extent of a person’s ailments is directly related to their level of foolishness. Leg pain, immobility, or even cancer, all stem from the rubbish in one’s mind. All physical ailments are related to a lack of wisdom and learning. Those who do not read or learn, and make decisions based on mere whim are detestable.

Who would turn away from wealth? With David’s arrival, Achish profited handsomely. Later, Achish benefited greatly from David. Past grievances are immaterial so long as one can profit from another. Achish could still find David useful. David calculated all this, and his plans gradually took shape.

Flexibility in Implementation

David said to Achish, “If I have found favour in your eyes, let a place be assigned to me in one of the country towns, that I may live there. Why should your servant live in the royal city with you?” So Achish gave him Ziklag that day, and Ziklag has belonged to the kings of Judah to this day. (1 Samuel 27:5-6)

David, standing before Achish, while calculating, must answer truthfully if questioned, and not stumble over his words. Flexibility in execution is paramount, and the ability to speak well is key. David fled to Gath with six hundred men, his assets. At the time, Achish was unaware of who had been anointed king of Israel. Few knew of David’s anointing, and Achish, focused on recruitment, saw this as a heaven-sent opportunity. He gave David Ziklag for him and his men to dwell in.

Ponder this: beyond these words, there were undoubtedly other idle exchanges. In conversation, establishing rapport is essential. If one speaks stiffly, projecting superiority, it creates discomfort. I encourage you to cultivate the habit of casual conversation; being able to speak well is crucial. Once the atmosphere is relaxed, presenting the main point becomes easier.

I have observed that many officials enjoy drinking precisely because it allows for casual conversation. Many also appreciate tea, promoting the Chinese “tea ceremony,” using “tea” as a springboard. The tea’s quality, the tree, the leaves, the fermentation, the preparation – a plethora of topics. People revel in “tea culture,” imagining themselves as tea connoisseurs. This is the capital of casual talk, drawn out beautifully. They might casually mention that Guan Yu once drank such tea, or that when Zhu Yuanzhang became emperor, he sought Yunnan’s Pu-erh tea. Whether true is irrelevant; it is merely a conversational gambit. You can say anything, as there is no way to verify it; one cannot summon Zhu Yuanzhang to confirm the story. It is simply a topic for idle chatter.

Recently, some call to ask if I have watched the World Cup, another form of casual talk. If someone brings up football with me, I say, “Spare me, it’s a sore subject.” They wonder, “Why does football pain you?” I recount the anecdote that I never managed to kick a ball as a child. Laughter ensues; it’s all banter. You must be able to banter, to speak well, before addressing serious matters – to create a conversational atmosphere.

Of course, 1 Samuel omits these trivialities. Including them would transform The Bible into Dream of the Red Chamber. These additions are mine, underscoring that adroitness in personal conduct requires eloquence. I admire articulate individuals. Even if they spin yarns, I commend them for their smoothness. The ability to lie without blushing is remarkable.

Achish asked, “Where have you been raiding today?” David said, “Against the southern part of Judah and against the southern part of the Jerahmeelites and against the southern part of the Kenites.” (1 Samuel 27:10)

David even pre-planned his reply: recent raids in southern Judah. Was southern Judah near the South Pole? The South Pole is south of Judah, as is Egypt. It sounds as if Judah had been thoroughly attacked. Southern Judah, southern Jerahmeelites, southern Kenites – all to the south, without specifics. One cannot fault his words. Through banter and conversation, Achish believed David. Eloquence is an asset; cultivate it.

I share these anecdotes to encourage you to amass jokes. I enjoy telling jokes. When someone travels far to see me, and I appear unremarkable, I explain that I have looked this way since childhood, eliciting a chuckle. Despite my appearance, I can still perform a trick, kicking a ball under my legs, drawing more laughter. The goal is to create a conversational atmosphere.

In a job interview, facing three suited, solemn interviewers, you must be articulate. Otherwise, when asked your name, you simply state your name; when asked if you are married, you say yes or no. Silence descends. I can offer a brief pre-interview training session, teaching you how to interview. A “Good” interview means Looks good，sounds good and feels good. Interviews are brief; interviewers lack time to deeply probe.

Master these three “Goods,” and if the interviewer is favourably impressed, the job is yours. Avoid trying to prove something immediately; that destroys the entire feeling. Ruining the “Good” is problematic. Cultivate these “Goods” in personal interactions. Whether the richest or most indebted, one has at least achieved “first” in life. Such people are articulate. Wang Jianlin sings well on stage, knowing how to please. Similarly, Jack Ma sings well. Lei Jun, although his English is imperfect, knows how to be humorous. “Do you love me, Ben?” This question always provokes laughter.

Whether in technology, business, or marketing, heed my advice: cultivate eloquence. It is vital, yet useless without substance. Without proper preparation, eloquence is unattainable. Eloquent individuals are often avid readers since childhood. Zhao Benshan is a master of banter. Great leaders, like Chairman Mao, excel at speaking. Whether in science or engineering, learn to speak well.

Firstly, be articulate; secondly, build relationships. David, in his prudence, fostered strong relationships with subordinates and superiors alike – a man of many connections. Mastering speech is fundamental to building relationships, relying on communication. Here, you observe my aptitude for networking. While not an expert, I would rate my speaking ability at least a passing grade out of 100.

Relationships are forged through conversation. Long online chats can lead to a feeling of familiarity upon meeting in person, like old friends. The existing connection fosters intimacy.

This explains why relationships in physical churches are often weak; members rarely interact. In church, a thousand individuals sit silently. The pastor urges them to say “Jesus loves you” to their neighbours, resulting in awkwardness and discomfort, especially for the shy, resembling rote learning. This stems from a lack of prior connection and communication. Online communication obviates the need for travel, allowing relationship-building through conversation.

Understand these three points: plan effectively, execute flexibly, and communicate and establish relationships. What kind of relationship should you build? Understand others’ needs and what you can offer. Achish and David’s relationship is one of mutual benefit. Expressing fundamental interests in conversation is crucial.

Achish asked what lands David had raided. David cited southern Judah, Jerahmeelites, and Kenites, sharing the spoils with Achish. David’s words were astute; withholding the plunder would have been problematic. Adapt to various environments. If one lives amidst constraints, cultivate shrewdness, a beneficial practice. I hope everyone embraces this idea. My dream is for all to be astute, as foolishness harms oneself and others.

David lived in Philistine territory a year and four months. (1 Samuel 27:7)

After a year and four months with Achish, Saul died, and David returned to Israel, becoming king. Let me remind you to be shrewd and discerning. In conclusion, the foolish focus solely on profit, ignoring losses; solely on gains, ignoring risks. I advise you to calculate risks beforehand. Neglecting risk management invites trouble.

I advocate calculating everything, including projects, systems, and personal conduct. Management requires managing people and affairs effectively. A person strong on the outside but weak on the inside is a poor choice and would be a bad manager. With that, may you all become shrewd.

May God bless you!